Consultation Hub

It is vital that CAP 1724 Flying Display Pilot Authorisation and Evaluation: Requirements and Guidance remains up-to-date and relevant, and that the CAA’s guidance material in these areas remains proportionate, clear and unambiguous.

We asked for feedback from the regulated community on proposed amendments to CAP 1724 ahead of the 2025 display season. 

We compiled a draft of CAP 1724 Edition 7 and consulted on it over four working weeks from 16 January 2025 to 12 February 2025. 

We received a total of 48 unique comments to the draft CAP 1724 from 15 respondents.  

Of all the comments, 27 clearly conveyed some sort of change and 21 were either unclear / not specific or suggested no changes, many being purely comments.  21% of all the comments supported the proposed amendments.

Of the 27 conveying a change, 17 were textual in nature, suggesting revised wording or highlighting minor drafting / clarification points, several being duplicated between respondents.  The other 10 comments were more substantive, calling for some sort of change of the underlying policy. 

We accepted 4 of the 27 comments suggesting some sort of change (15%).  3 of these comprised of rewording content or the addition of further information for additional clarification, we have tried to take a balanced view on what would be helpful.  The other comment concerned a minor policy change.

Of the remaining 23, 8 concerned points that were already covered elsewhere (either in this CAP or CAP403), 7 concerned issues that are beyond the scope of this CAP, 1 suggested a change that had already been made, 2 were unclear / not specific and 5 were aimed at sensitive text that we are unable to change.

Regarding the 10 more substantive comments we received, we implemented 1. Of those we elected not to implement, some were beyond the scope of CAP 1724, others were covered adequately either in this document or elsewhere, some concerned suggestions for unacceptable changes to policy and it was considered that the remaining might have further unintended consequences.

We have produced a final version of CAP 1724 Edition 7 which was published on 10 March 2025. 

It is vital that CAP 403 Flying Displays and Special Events: Safety and Administrative Requirements and Guidance remains up-to-date and relevant, and that the CAA’s guidance material in these areas remains proportionate, clear and unambiguous.

We asked for feedback from the regulated community on proposed amendments to CAP 403 ahead of the 2025 display season. 

We compiled a draft of CAP 403 Edition 22 and consulted on it over four working weeks from 09 December 2024 to 03 January 2025.

We received a total of 65 unique comments to the draft CAP 403 from 12 respondents.  

Of all the comments, 44 clearly conveyed some sort of change and 21 were either unclear / not specific or suggested no changes, many being purely comments. 

Of the 44 conveying a change, 27 were textual in nature, suggesting revised wording or highlighting minor drafting / clarification points, several being duplicated between respondents.  The other 17 comments were more substantive, calling for some sort of change of the underlying policy. 

We accepted 12 of the 44 comments suggesting some sort of change (27%). 10 of these comprised of rewording content or the addition of further information for additional clarification, we have tried to take a balanced view on what would be helpful.  The other 2 concerned minor policy changes.

Of the remaining 32, 12 concerned points that were already covered elsewhere (either in this CAP or CAP1724), 8 were comments that were unclear / not specific or concerned issues with formatting that we were unable to replicate, 8 were aimed at sensitive text that had been changed to align with and reflect wider CAA policy and 4 involved suggested changes to underlying policy.

Regarding the 17 more substantive comments we received, we implemented 2. Of those we elected not to implement, some were beyond the scope of CAP403, others were covered adequately either in this document or elsewhere, some concerned suggestions for unacceptable changes to policy and it was considered that the remaining might have further unintended consequences.

We have produced a final version of CAP 403 Edition 22 which was published on 4 February 2025. 

For comments on the proposal that the CAA continues its existing policy to recognise certain EASA Form 1s as equivalent to CAA Form 1s in certain limited circumstances, namely for maintained parts released by the Original Equipment Manufacturer or authorised agent for use on aircraft falling within the scope of Part-ML, where a component cannot be repaired by an organisation holding a UK approval. Currently this is managed by CAA ORS9 Decision No. 24 that was issued in December 2022 with an expiry date of 31 December 2024. We proposed in the consultation to extend this policy until 31^st December 2029.

To achieve the policy objective the CAA proposed to amend the current end date within Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) to UK Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014 (the UK Continuing Airworthiness Regulation), specifically in Part-145, and Part-ML to reflect the 2029 deadline. The amendments clarify that specified EASA Form 1s (only) are ‘equivalent documents’ as permitted by the terms of the regulation to which the AMC applies.

We received 31 responses.

We received strong support of (90%) for the CAA to continue its policy of recognising certain EASA Form 1s as equivalent to CAA Form 1s in certain limited circumstances.

We received significant support (77%) for the proposed wording of AMC1 ML.A.501(a)(ii) Classification and installation.

We received significant support (70%) for the proposed wording of AMC1 145.A.42(a)(i) Components.

We received comments suggesting that the new decision should be issued indefinitely. This is not considered a viable option as the UK would be unilaterally accepting parts from the EU without any sort of reciprocal arrangement. However, the CAA will review annually the need for the new decision and will continue encouragement for foreign organisations to obtain CAA approval. We will also seek to look at a more permanent solution for beyond December 2029.

We received several comments relating to widening the scope of the decision to include Part-CAMO/Part-M aircraft. This was not in the scope of the original decision and given the targeted requirement of the use of Article 4 (1A) within the UK Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014, we are unable to extend this provision further outside the scope of Part-ML.

We received comments to clarify where the EASA approved organisation must be located. By means of a typographical correction made to the AMC to align with the original decision, we have clarified within the AMC that it must be an EASA approved organisation based within an EASA member state.

We have decided to issue a new decision following the policy set by the original Decision 24 and thereby amend the current end date to 31^st December 2029 within AMC to UK (EU) Regulation 1321/2014. The new decision will apply as follows:

• Provided that the component is not available from a CAA approved organisation, a maintenance organisation in a state with which the UK has a bilateral safety agreement, or an organisation based in a state with whose NAA the CAA has a working arrangement, components of Part-ML aircraft released on an EASA Form 1 by the component’s original equipment (or their approved agent) manufacturer based in an EASA member state may be fitted to a UK registered aircraft.