Policy for ADR applicants and approved ADR entities
Feedback updated 18 Feb 2021
We asked
Since the most recent revision to CAP1324 in February 2019, the CAA has been in discussions with stakeholders on further potential enhancements to its ADR policy, both to make ADR work better for consumers and to encourage airlines that do not currently participate in ADR to consider again the merits of the schemes that are offered by the two CAA-approved ADR bodies. We asked for comments on the latest planned changes to CAP1324 which contain these policies.
You said
We received 13 responses to our consultation, which covered five policy areas.
The majority of respondents welcomed clarification on the view that the ADR regulations permit ADR bodies to introduce a post-decision review process, the proposal to allow ADR bodies to implement trust account arrangements for the payment of consumer awards and clarification that ADR bodies can establish procedures for handling claims for statutory compensation on a flight basis rather than a claim basis.
There was a mixed response to the proposals for the handling of passenger complaints that raise issues that are genuinely complex and novel for the purpose of establishing extraordinary circumstances under Regulation EC 261/20044.
We did
Where concerns were raised by respondents, the CAA has addressed these in its decision document (CAP2104). This includes clarifications and reassurance regarding this policy change and reiterates the CAA’s intention to review all policy changes after 2 years.
In regard to the proposal around complex and novel cases, the CAA has amended the wording of the policy to expand the sharing of information to include the passenger and to clarify that whilst we do not expect this process to be invoked often, it would not be appropriate to define the frequency with which it could occur.
Overview
Since the most recent revision to CAP1324 in February 2019, the CAA has been in discussions with stakeholders on further potential enhancements to its ADR policy, both to make ADR work better for consumers and to encourage airlines that do not currently participate in ADR to consider again the merits of the schemes that are offered by the two CAA-approved ADR bodies (namely CEDR and AviationADR).
Why your views matter
Whenever considering amendments to its ADR policy, the CAA will usually consult both CEDR and AviationADR as the relevant regulated entities. In contrast, the CAA would not typically consult airlines or airports as they are not the regulated entities in this situation, but rather they are contracting (or potentially contracting) parties.
However, given the interest expressed by a number of airlines in the proposed changes, in this case we have decided to extend the consultation to include airlines and airports. We would also welcome the views of consumer representatives and others on the planned changes.
How to Respond
You are invited to respond to the CAA’s consultation on its proposed revisions to CAP1324 (and the related document 'CAA draft list of issues which it does not consider to be complex or novel'). For your ease of reference, the proposed substantive amendments and references to the text where the amendments have been made are summarised in the associated Explanatory Note.
If you would like to respond to this consultation, please send your response to consumerenforcement@caa.co.uk by 5pm on Friday 20 November.
Audiences
- Commercial airlines
- Airport operators
- Regulatory bodies
Interests
- Consumer protection
Share
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook